Tuesday, December 22, 2020

Social Media

 

Sites are ordered by global Alexa Traffic Rank. Please help to improve this list by commenting with any new alternatives you find or status updates. Last updated 2020-2-3.

Active Reddit alternatives

name url rank features
voat voat.co 11,700 reddit-based
gab gab.com 14,100 open source
steemit steemit.com 14,600 open source, blockchain
minds minds.com 20,800 open source
mastodon mastodon.social 26,700 open source, federated
papaly papaly.com 40,000
the donald thedonald.win 40,900
saidit saidit.net 45,800 open source, reddit-based
notabug notabug.io 51,000 open source, federated, reddit-based
snapzu snapzu.com 70,500
shufflehex shufflehex.com 94,900
pillowfort pillowfort.social 132,000
poal poal.co 156,000 reddit-based
mamby mamby.com 173,000
lobsters lobste.rs 186,000 open source
hubski hubski.com 202,000
raddle raddle.me 206,000 open source, reddit-based
sapien beta.sapien.network 224,000
yours yours.org 444,000
tildes tildes.net 465,000 open source, reddit-based
phuks phuks.co 490,000 open source, reddit-based
hyvor groups groups.hyvor.com 491,000

 

Less active Reddit alternatives

name url rank features
pocketnet pocketnet.app 543,000 open source, blockchain
monalo monalo.net 598,000
dangerus dangeru.us 755,000 open source
dojo press dojo.press 766,000
stacksity stacksity.com 784,000
lemmy dev.lemmy.ml 787,000 open source, reddit-based
memo memo.cash 823,000 open source
campus society campussociety.com 1,965,000
darto darto.com 2,166,000 reddit-based
scuttlebutt scuttlebutt.nz 2,397,000 open source, non-web
unfollo unfollo.com 2,518,000
bitmessage bitmessage.org 2,573,000 non-web
readup readup.com 2,720,000
headcycle headcycle.com 2,813,000
yaddu yaddu.pw 2,888,000 reddit-based
aether getaether.net 2,956,000 open source, non-web
threadbase threadbase.io 3,468,000
discussions discussions.app 3,653,000 open source, reddit-based, blockchain
littr littr.me 4,722,000 open source
weco weco.io 4,883,000 open source
poptopnews poptopnews.com 5,720,000
panjury panjury.com 6,977,000
post with me postwith.me 7,888,000
vlnc vlnc.co 8,273,000
atob atob.xyz 8,753,000
dot world.dot.world 8,754,000
parley parley.io 8,755,000
dissent dissent.cx n/a reddit-based
dread dreadditevelidot.onion n/a reddit-based, non-web

 

Reddit and similar established sites

name url rank features
reddit reddit.com 18
stack exchange stackexchange.com 105
discord discordapp.com 136
quora quora.com 228
4chan censored by reddit 947
band band.us 2,617
hacker news news.ycombinator.com 4,500
slashdot slashdot.org 7,000

 

Graveyard, dead or inactive

3tags, empeopled, votable, linkibl, frizbee, pushdup, stations, zeefeed, piroot, cillo, karrmic, peruza, qetzl, sorrit, reactacular.me, snicx, trendulus, ratesome, 9dot, hereshot, quickanswer, gameiki, campfire, eos-forum, wishfie, perusen, flowchat, panpact, elmers, voten, 8chan, prismo

Prior list posts: 3.0, 2.0, 1.0

Monday, December 21, 2020

How to Prevent, Identify and Address Vicarious Trauma — While Conducting Open Source Investigations in the Middle East

 

How to Prevent, Identify and Address Vicarious Trauma — While Conducting Open Source Investigations in the Middle East

Whether it involves victims of a chemical attack or a bombing, open source investigators are required to watch and interact with raw footage from the field — it lies at the core of online open source investigation. As a consequence of the increase in eyewitness media, investigators come in contact with a high amount of graphic footage. While this is potential evidence for investigative and accountability purposes, we must be mindful of the effects that traumatic media can have on those coming in contact with it on a regular basis. The consequence of repeated exposure to eyewitness media or testimony is secondary, or vicarious, trauma. It is mental distress that is experienced as an outcome of interacting with graphic online media.

This guide is intended to serve as an educational tool for those working in the open source investigative field. It includes research of Sam Dubberley, Manager at Amnesty International’s Digital Verification Corps/contributor to the EyeWitness Media Hub, as well as the author’s experience at the Open Source Investigations Lab in the Human Rights Center at UC Berkeley Law School. The guide focuses on themes from investigative work as related to the Middle East, but can be adapted to other geographic areas.

Preventing Secondary Trauma

Content from open source investigations in the Middle East is often very graphic in nature. Knowing how to prevent secondary trauma is the first step in slowing burnout caused by vicarious trauma in the human rights field.

One key feature of preventing secondary trauma is knowing yourself, and thus knowing what images affect you the most. For some people, the sound of crying children is particularly traumatic. For others, it is explicit physical injuries. Understanding your own sensitivities is critical for preventing trauma as it allows for mental preparation. One is particularly vulnerable to secondary trauma when the mind is not prepared for or surprised by what it encounters. As a result, it is imperative that you compose yourself mentally for what you are about to see, as well as warning colleagues about traumatic media you intend to show them.  

Another important factor in preventing secondary trauma is understanding your background and environment. Having a personal connection to the work you are investigating can intensify secondary trauma. The conditions that are valuable when conducting open source investigation in the Middle East, such as the ability to speak Arabic or having personal connections to the region, can often cause the impact of graphic media to be more traumatic. Your environment can also impact your susceptibility for secondary trauma. Keep investigative work contained to an office. If you work from home, keep work out of your bedroom. It is important to keep a safe space to come home to. Maintaining a routine with time limits is also necessary. Set time blocks for your work and make an effort to limit work at night.

Prevention when working on open source platforms

When working with media on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook there are several tools to reduce the risk of secondary trauma.

  1. When you are working with a YouTube video, first and foremost, mute your volume. Research shows that sounds of trauma are oftentimes more harmful than images.
  2. While the video is paused, use your cursor to hover over the progress bar to preview the video in thumbnail form (this only works for YouTube and Facebook video and not for Twitter), allowing you to see if/when there is any content that might be traumatic and prepare yourself. If a video includes something particularly explicit, or you are watching the video multiple times for a verification, consider using a sticky note or your hand to cover graphic images.
  3. Always have autoplay turned off. This prevents you from being surprised by another video that could be graphic. In Facebook and Twitter, this has to be done manually in settings.
  4. Lastly, if you are a non-Arabic speaker, translate the title and description of the video you are working on. Start to recognize words that might signal explicit content. Below are a few words to keep in mind.
child طفل/طفلة
chemical attack الهجوم الكيميائي
martyr شهيد
bomb قنبلة
torture تعذيب
family أسرة/عائلة
hospital مستشفى
injury الإصابة

Identifying Secondary Trauma

Overtime, even with vigilance, frequent exposure to graphic content can begin to affect the most resolute investigator. Here are some warning signs to be mindful of in your own life.

Look for changes in your sleep, diet and relationships:

  • Are you sleeping more than normal, not being able to sleep, or having nightmares?
  • Have you started to eat more junk food, or has your appetite decreased?
  • Do you spend more time alone, possibly pushing those close to you away?
  • Has your relationship to drugs and/or alcohol changed?

Veering from normal habits can be a sign that your open source investigative work might be negatively affecting you. Once you recognize these signs it is time to pause and evaluate your mental health.

Addressing Secondary Trauma

If you begin to feel like you are experiencing symptoms of secondary trauma, pause, and reflect on the effects it may be having on you. Take a step back. As open source investigators, we often want to push through these feelings, ignoring them to continue our work. There is a sense of helplessness that comes from being idle in the investigative field. However, to be a productive investigator in the Middle East you must to address the trauma you are experiencing.

Connect with friends and family. Oftentimes connecting with those not in the investigative field provides a welcome break. Opening up to colleagues is equally, if not more, helpful. Your colleagues know exactly what you are going through and what you have been exposed to on a daily basis. Taking time to reflect and support one another is essential for addressing and overcoming trauma.

Finding mental relaxation activities to perform is additionally important. Exercise and meditation have been shown to alleviate the symptoms of vicarious trauma. Introducing exercise can help to reduce anxiety and depression, and provides an aspect of your life in your control. Meditation can be a helpful activity to relax the mind. There are many apps such as The Mindfulness App, Insight Timer, and Headspace that guide you through mediation routines. Decompressing with lite TV or videos can also provide a needed mental break.

Find what works best for you. If symptoms persist, you may want to consider professional counselling.

Conclusion

The Middle East is culturally rich. Yet as investigators we are often only interacting with the most heinous aspects of the region. At the Human Rights Center we deliberately put aside time for Middle Eastern music, art, and poetry, each week to remind us of the beauty and humanity of the region. This helped alleviate potential tunnel vision and lessen the despondency that could build over time.

When conducting open source investigations on the Middle East and North Africa be attentive to your own health. Take breaks, interact with content wisely, and maintain your community. De-stigmatizing the mental stress that comes with this work is equally important. 

 https://www.bellingcat.com/resources/how-tos/2018/10/18/prevent-identify-address-vicarious-trauma-conducting-open-source-investigations-middle-east/

 

Parler, MeWe, Gab gain momentum as conservative social media alternatives in Biden Liberal Cenorship Age age Nathan Bomey USA TODAY

 

America's crisis of political segregation – we increasingly don't live alongside, associate with or even marry people who think differently from us – is increasingly leading conservatives to congregate together on social media outlets designed specifically for people who think like them.

The recent rise of Parler – as well as other social media alternatives that appeal primarily to conservatives and that got their start largely by attracting the far right – raises the specter of further political polarization through digital means. Parler and others, like MeWe and Gab, are gaining momentum with a promise not to censor their users for behavior that might violate the policies of their rivals. MeWe stressed that it does not have a policy of “anything goes” but that “it is counter to the premise of social media to censor these conversations for political reasons.”

Parler said in its Nov. 7 "community guidelines" that it won't decide what content will be "removed or filtered, or whose account will be removed, on the basis of the opinion expressed within the content."

Supporters say Parler is preserving free speech and is correcting for the overreach of the mainstream social media platforms, which applied labels to or limited the reach of many of President Donald Trump's misleading posts during the week of the election.

"Constantly jumping in and correcting things for the record and feeling like it’s one way feels inappropriate to me," said Trent Read of the Salt Lake City area, who said he plans to shift from Twitter and Facebook to Parler. "If I can be a small part of sending a message to them to tell them to stay out of my business, that would be a positive thing."


 

But, much like the social media site Gab, Parler has quickly attracted the extremist crowd in addition to self-proclaimed center-right conservatives like Read. Groups from the far-right Proud Boys, which includes large numbers of white supremacists, to heavily armed anti-government militias have gathered on the site to spread conspiracy theories, racist memes and false claims of election fraud.       

Yet for an electorate stricken with deep fissures on race, politics and class, the act of dividing social media loyalties into liberal and conservative camps could reflect a natural next step deeper into polarized terrain.

"I think it’s inevitable that we’ll see the rise of conservative, separate or distinct social media," said Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow and U.S. political scholar at the Brookings Institution, a Washington-based think tank. "It’s only a question of where and how fast it will form and how extreme and partisan it will become."

Done with Facebook? Alternatives pop up

 

Parler gaining momentum

Proponents of conservative alternatives to Facebook, Twitter and YouTube say that they are exercising their free-speech right to establish a forum for political discussion free from the moderation policies of the mainstream platforms.

Parler said it will take down only content or accounts that are being "used as a tool for crime, civil torts, or other unlawful acts," including terrorism, child pornography or copyright violations. Promoting spam also qualifies.

“People deserve better," Parler said in a statement last week after Facebook and Twitter took action against Trump's tweets. "They don’t need to be coddled, assigned a ‘safe space’ where they are told what they are permitted to think."

That message seems to have struck a chord. Parler was the No. 1 free app downloaded through Apple's App Store and Google Play on Tuesday, according to market research firm SensorTower.

What's more, Facebook users have been gathering momentum with coordinated plans to persuade people to leave the platform. 

A public group promoting a "mass exit" off of Facebook on Nov. 13 had attracted more than 451,000 people who said they're "going" or "interested" as of Tuesday afternoon.

"The point of this movement is to get off of these censored social media pages," the group's organizer posted Monday. "I encourage everyone to go on any social media site that will not censor you. No more 'fact checkers' or people deleting or putting us in time out."

Parler said its membership has jumped from about 4.5 million a week ago to about 8 million. Among its users, about 500,000 were active two weeks ago, and about 4 million are active now, Parler said.

"Our growth is not attributable to any one person or group, but rather to Parler’s efforts to earn our community’s trust, both by protecting their privacy, and being transparent about the way in which their content is handled on our platform," Chief Operating Officer Jeffrey Wernick said in an emailed response to USA TODAY questions.

Salt Lake City area resident Read said his frustration with the "nanny state" on Twitter and Facebook, particularly with their application of warning labels to the president's posts, was a tipping point for him.

"Hyperbole is where he lives and plays," Read said of Trump. "It feels like they don’t believe we have the intelligence to filter through hyperbole and figure out truth from error."

Prominent American politicians and media personalities have also made a point of joining the new platforms. 

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican, announced Tuesday that she had joined MeWe, a platform billing itself as the "anti" Facebook, with no ads, targeting, political bias or news feed manipulation. Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo said after the election that she was leaving Twitter for Parler, saying Twitter had "abused power."

Twitter declined to comment for this story, and Facebook did not respond to a request seeking comment.

A natural next step in social media


Experts on political polarization say it's a natural outgrowth of our divided culture for Americans to begin choosing their social media services based on the political identity of those platforms.

"This is America in 2020," said Josh Pasek, an expert on political communication and misinformation and a professor at the University of Michigan. "We’re defriending people over politics. We have an urban-rural divide. We have a racial divide. At the end of the day, what do you end up with? You end up with an increasingly segmented society."

The environment it fosters is conducive to confirmation bias, a psychological condition that describes our human tendency to seek out information that reinforces our preexisting beliefs. That tendency is not exclusive to one particular political persuasion.

Confirmation bias and groupthink can be harmless in the case of fairly innocuous issues. But it can be harmful in the case of dangerous conspiracy theories like QAnon. 

Backers of the extremist ideology have migrated to Parler in recent months, said Angelo Carusone, president of Media Matters for America, a watchdog group that monitors news reports and social media. Militia groups and white supremacists, such as the Proud Boys, have also increased their activity on alternative social media services.

"A lot of the skeletons of the larger right-wing echo chamber have moved or set up shop on Parler, especially in the wake of some concerted actions by the platforms" like Facebook and Twitter to crack down on extremist content and misinformation, Carusone said.

He said Parler's reach is likely to be limited in part because it appeals almost exclusively to hard-core conservatives, unlike Facebook and Twitter, which have a broad cross-section of users who can come into contact with misinformation or misleading content circulating on those platforms.

"It’s going to give them that fervency and that ability to organize," Carusone said. "It’s going to become a genuine echo chamber where they’re really talking to each other."

That has certainly happened on Gab, a social media site that has largely become a gathering place for extremists from neo-Nazis to the militia movement known as the Boogaloo Bois. Spurred on by founder and CEO Andrew Torba, who regularly posts conspiracy theories and shares posts from extremists, the site has gained a reputation as a repository of toxic content. 

Among the topics that have flourished on conservative social media alternatives is the validity of the election results, including Democratic nominee Joe Biden's defeat of Trump. Despite the absence of substantive evidence of vote fraud, accusations of electoral hijinks are thriving.

On Tuesday afternoon, active hashtags being discussed by users on Parler included #ELECTIONFRAUD, #STOPTHESTEAL and #VOTERFRAUD. Meanwhile, Gab's Torba sent an email on Tuesday to users claiming that his service will help expose "this fake 'President elect.'"

Rauch, the Brookings scholar, said the fact that Facebook "seems to favor conservatives" has been lost on the service's Republican critics. 

"They've got their facts wrong," he said. But "we know that Trump world is in the business of disinformation. It’s their business model."

And that business model is likely to endure in the form of social media outlets that enable hard-core political content, he added.

"We’re going to have to live with it," Rauch said.

Contributing: Will Carless

Follow USA TODAY reporter Nathan Bomey on Twitter @NathanBomey.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Could Fox News lose its grip on conservative viewers to Newsmax, OAN? - by Nathan Bomey USA TODAY

 

A surge of post-election momentum for pro-Trump networks suggests that Fox News’ status as the primary cable news destination of far-right conservative viewers may not be as solid as previously thought.

But it’s unclear whether recent audience growth for Newsmax and One America News (OAN) is sustainable – and experts question whether those networks can lure the type of advertisers that have enriched Fox News.

In the period leading up to the election and in the weeks thereafter, Newsmax and OAN have attracted a growing audience of far-right conservatives by amplifying President Donald Trump's false declaration of victory and his unfounded accusations of election fraud.

Newsmax, the larger of the two, appears to have made a dent in Fox News’ ratings since then, although Fox News remains the far-and-away leader.

Bea Quirk, a 76-year-old retiree from Colonial Beach, Virginia, said she switched from Fox News to Newsmax after Fox News "pushed Trump aside" by declaring Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election.

"I have watched Fox News since long before Trump walked down the aisle," she said. "I'm a Trump fan. I don't like the way he was treated."

In the last full week before the election, primetime ratings for Fox News were more than 90 times greater than primetime ratings for Newsmax, according to ratings tracker Nielsen.

But in the first full week after the election, Fox News' lead had declined to less than nine times the ratings of Newsmax. And by the week of Nov. 30, the lead was down to less than seven times.

“Fox News is being forced to actually compete for its audience for the first time in years,” said Matt Gertz, senior fellow at Media Matters for America, a liberal watchdog group that closely tracks cable news. “They have had more or less a monopoly over right-wing cable news and have been the focal point of the overall conservative media ecosystem for decades – and now they are needing to deal with competitors coming from the right and trying to take away some of their market share.”

To be sure, Fox News has remained the most-watched cable news network in primetime, also besting CNN and MSNBC despite recent growth for those networks. But the momentum is undeniable for Newsmax, which averaged 401,000 viewers in primetime the week of Nov. 30, compared with 57,000 the week before the election and 233,000 the week of the election, according to Nielsen.

Facebook, Twitter take notice:Parler, MeWe, Gab gain momentum as conservative social media alternatives

The surge for Newsmax in recent weeks even attracted the attention of “Saturday Night Live,” which spoofed the network in a skit about a sports channel that won’t acknowledge that the woeful New York Jets have ever lost a football game.

Fox News declined to comment for this story. But Steve Tomsic, chief financial officer of Fox News owner Fox Corp., recently told analysts and investors that the network “has got amazing brand loyalty” with a broad base of support that extends beyond the primetime lineup to its daytime shows and an extensive online and TV newsgathering operation.

“We don't take lightly the potential for competition, whether it's the existing sort of classic MSNBC or CNN, or the sort of emerging ones like Newsmax and OAN,” Tomsic said at an investment conference, adding that “we kind of welcome it because it sharpens us up and gives us a real focus.”

Newsmax emerges

Founded in 1998, Newsmax viewership has surged in recent weeks by giving airtime to baseless claims of election fraud and winning the support of Trump himself, who has been enraged following his loss to former Vice President Joe Biden and has refused to concede victory, promoting falsehoods about the reliability of the election results.

Trump has promoted Newsmax shows to his more than 88 million followers on Twitter as alternatives to programs on Fox News, which angered the president and his supporters when it called the state of Arizona and then the entire election for Joe Biden.

Those moves “really made people upset with Fox, and they realized that Fox had not been as fair in his coverage to the president, and so they decided to introduce a social media eruption,” Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy said in an interview. “That led to our success and ratings.”

Ruddy said conservative viewers are seeking a “new and fresh” outlet that isn't overly critical of the president.

“I think there was a perception that Fox could no longer be trusted,” he said.

Like Newsmax, OAN has developed a loyal following with a steady stream of reports that appeal to far-right conservatives. OAN, which was founded in 2013 by Robert Herring and owned by Herring Networks, has spent considerable time reporting on accusations of election fraud.

To be sure, Fox News has also been widely accused of serving as a breeding ground for Trump’s propagation of numerous falsehoods during his time in office. He has even consulted with Fox News hosts for political advice – namely, primetime star and White House loyalist Sean Hannity – and, in the past, has promoted Fox shows through Twitter.

“They have been very supportive of him,” Gertz said. But Trump, a faithful viewer, “has been convinced that they are not a loyal enough propaganda outlet.”

Josh Pasek, a political science and media professor at the University of Michigan, said Fox News' willingness to declare Biden the winner showed “there really is a limit to how polarized Fox News is willing to be.”

“When someone wins, you call them president-elect, and that’s a journalistic norm that they’re holding with,” he said. “If that journalistic piece isn’t present at all in people’s environments, then they have the potential to be living in a completely alternate reality.”

 

Newsmax, on the other hand, did not call Biden “president-elect” until a majority of the Electoral College officially voted on Dec. 14 for the former vice president.

On Newsmax, Trump has largely not had to worry about facing skeptical or critical coverage. With supporters like its most popular primetime host, Greg Kelly, consistently promoting Trump’s agenda, the network has become a welcome place for true believers in the president, including supportive commentators. The network and its website have given credence to accusations of election fraud that have no basis in fact, leading critics to assail the company as irresponsible and unethical.

Ruddy defended the outlet as “more fair and balanced” than Fox.

“The president and his lawyers have made certain allegations about the election, and I think it’s our job to report that,” he said.

Quirk, the Virginia resident and Trump fan, said she likes Newsmax because "they're telling the news."

"They don't say everything good about the Republicans, and they don't say everything bad about the Democrats," she said. "They give you the layout on both of them so you can make your own mind up."

Will advertisers follow?

From a financial standpoint, in addition to viewership counts, Fox News remains far more powerful than Newsmax or the smaller OAN, which isn’t large enough to be tracked via Nielsen ratings.

Newsmax “still pays to get distribution on cable” and is “likely” facing a “multi-year lossmaking initiative” as it looks to expand its operations, Barclays analyst Kannan Venkateshwar wrote in a Dec. 4 research note. The company had about $59 million in revenue in 2018, compared with $2.7 billion for Fox News, Barclays estimated. But that figure has almost certainly risen since then, given the surge in viewership and readership the company has experienced since Trump cast a spotlight on the network.

Daily active users of Newsmax's mobile app have soared in recent weeks, rising from about 156,000 on Oct. 20 to a peak of 2.25 million on Nov. 24, before settling in around 1.9 million by Dec. 12, according to Apptopia, a mobile intelligence firm.

Ruddy said Newsmax can eventually challenge Fox News for viewership and advertising, pointing to Fox News’ ability to quickly overtake CNN as the highest-rated cable news channel as an example of how easy it is for an established network to lose ground. He said Newsmax would benefit from its narrower focus on news and politics, compared with Fox News’ wider range of interests, including entertainment news.

Since the election, Newsmax has hired 25 new employees, and “we’ll probably hire another 25 to 30 in the next two months,” Ruddy said. Among them: The network recently added former Fox News host Rob Schmitt to host a show at 10 p.m. and plans to “increase our coverage” on weekends, Ruddy said.

Will it be enough to attract lucrative advertising? Major corporate sponsors have been skittish about backing highly political content on Fox News’ primetime lineup in recent years, Media Matters fellow Gertz said.

For now, Newsmax is getting "low-level advertisers” and is profiting from “newsletters where they basically sell out their audience to hucksters and scammers,” Gertz said.

Ruddy said the company has no “problem with advertisers” and said that the network’s current sponsors are “getting a tremendous value” since “our rates haven’t kept up” with recent audience growth.

The polarization of media in America

The rise of outlets like Newsmax and OAN raises concerns among political scientists that the media environment is becoming further polarized, hearkening to an early-America era in which partisanship consumed journalism.

Newsmax and OAN are cultivating a “larger group of people who are functionally disconnected from a reality that doesn’t fit their partisan bias,” the University of Michigan’s Pasek said. “And that’s dangerous because living in a shared information environment on some level is critical to a functioning democracy.”

With Trump set to leave in office within weeks, far-right conservative outlets may become increasingly emboldened as they play the role of opposition to Biden, experts said.

“I don’t doubt that they’ll be able to continue their momentum in many respects,” Pasek said. “It is very easy to become more extreme and to buy into a whole bunch of conspiracy theories when your side is out of power.”

But there is almost surely still a significant place for Fox News to serve as a “broad-based and not-super-extreme” home for conservatives, Pasek said.

“That gives Fox a huge potential audience,” he said.

That said, if Trump no longer promotes Fox News and, in fact, continues to actively criticize the network, that could spur some of his supporters to look elsewhere.

Throughout much of his presidency, Trump has used his platform to bolster Fox News. From Sept. 1, 2018, through Aug. 31, 2020, he posted 1,206 tweets about watching cable news, 95% of which were about Fox News or Fox Business, according to Gertz’s analysis.

But in the wake of the election, from Nov. 15 through Dec. 2, 53% of his cable news tweets were about Fox News or Fox Business, while 37% were about OAN and 10% were about Newsmax.

If Newsmax and OAN continue to give Trump and his supporters a platform to circulate falsehoods even after he’s left office, they could continue the type of symbiotic relationship they already have in place.

“Newsmax right now is trying to, as clearly as possible, openly say that they are a pro-Trump network and attract an audience that way,” Gertz said.

But Fox News, “regardless of how supportive they are of the president, they cannot cross the line into saying they are a pro-Trump network” since they are trying “to sell themselves to advertisers as a legitimate news network,” Gertz said.

On OAN, meanwhile, anchors and writers have treated Trump’s election fraud claims as potentially legitimate. OAN President Charles Herring did not agree to a phone interview for this story and did not respond to emailed questions after previously agreeing to do so.

Like Newsmax, daily active users of OAN have also increased in recent weeks, rising from about 107,000 on Oct. 20 to a peak of 621,000 on Dec. 7.

OAN is capitalizing on “really unhinged conspiracy theories about global government,” Gertz said. “OAN has even less of a connection with reality.”

Follow USA TODAY reporter Nathan Bomey on Twitter @NathanBomey.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, December 19, 2020

Americans: Stop Assuming You Still Have A Country—Organize! - by James Kirkpatrick • 17 Dec 2020

 

We’re already in the post-American age and arbitrary law enforcement, restrictions on free speech, and mob justice are just the beginning. There will be no negative consequences for those who destroyed American cities via misguided policies and Leftist protests. Instead, the government will center on the Dissident Right the same way the Soviets did on kulaks: as the “wreckers” that are the one thing that is holding us back from egalitarian utopia. American “conservatism” will not be able to respond to this challenge because it is incapable (or unwilling) to recognize that the problem we face is here, not in Moscow or Beijing. My views: for now, Americans must geographically concentrate, establish as much economic independence as possible, politically mobilize for universal access to government programs, and expand their autonomy as much as possible while new institutions and movements are created.

We’re getting a sneak peek at what’s coming with the clearly coordinated Main Stream Media coverage of the Proud Boys at the recent Stop The Steal rally in Washington D.C. Your tax dollars subsidized an article from NPR that said “the widespread embrace of conspiracy and disinformation amounts to ‘mass radicalization’” that will lead to terrorism [Right-Wing Embrace of Conspiracy Is ‘Mass Radicalization,’ Experts Warn, by Hannah Allam, December 15, 2020]. There were many other slanted stories about the violence accompanying the protests:

There’s an obvious question here. Who did the stabbing? Naturally, most of the stories don’t report it—they simply associate “Proud Boys” and “stabbing.”

However, after some digging, you can find photo evidence that the Proud Boys appeared to be the victims here. The man arrested for stabbing is African-American. Of course, an arrest is not proof of guilt [Philip Johnson Accused in Four Washington D.C. Stabbings at Pro Trump Protest, by Jessica McBride, Heavy, December 13, 2020]. However, we do know that at least one of the victims was a Trump supporter—revealed in a Minneapolis StarTribune article that basically reads like a dox [Twin Cities man among Proud Boys demonstrators in D.C. is stabbed, police say, by Paul Walsh, December 15, 2020].

As Michelle Malkin noted, there was also widespread media coverage of several Black Lives Matter signs being burned during the D.C. disturbances. Now of course, stealing a church sign and burning it is a crime. It is property destruction. It should be punished. Yet it’s the MSM which has been lecturing us about why property destruction should either be tolerated, or, indeed, encouraged.

President Trump said he would ban flag burning. But he did not. Burning the American flag is barely even noticeable now.

In contrast, BLM, a movement which most people hadn’t even heard of a year ago, now has quasi-religious importance. It even has a communion of saints—Breonna Taylor, Jacob Blake, Mike Brown, George Floyd—and foundational myths that resemble something like a new religion than a political creed [BLMania and the New Progressive Faith, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, December 17, 2020]. Thus burning BLM signs isn’t just property destruction, it’s blasphemy.

Blacks are also becoming a semi-sovereign people, already enjoying government privileges and now even symbolic gestures like their own “national anthem.”

For that reason, the Narrative now clearly being set up that Trump supporters have been “radicalized” is deeply worrisome. Those in power want to censor and control information even more than they already do:

Experts on radicalization and deradicalization are less worried about what will happen with Trump—and more worried about what his diehard supporters will do in a post-Trump America.

[This keeps me up at night,” by Aymann Ismail, Slate, November 24, 2020]

One “expert,” Cynthia Miller-Idriss, runs the “Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab” [PERIL]. She too wants more speech control:

As long as people as consistently exposed to extremist rhetoric, we will likely continue to see extremist violence. This is true whether that exposure is in fringe internet forums or in the campaign speeches of mainstream politicians.

[Stop calling far-right terrorists ‘crazy,’ Politico, February 20, 2020].

But of course the question is: who gets to decide what is “extremist?” Transgenderism in schools, or tearing down statues of George Washington, would have been considered impossible alarmism ten years ago. But it’s barely noticeable now.

And who determines the level of “exposure?” Despite all the cries about President Trump’s “authoritarianism,” it’s the supposed “free press” which has given up on democracy. Many MSM stories now are direct demands for a person, group, or movement to be deplatformed or stripped of basic financial services.

Of course, such actions serve to delegitimize the system because it shows that it actually is rigged, with Big Tech companies and media outlets making sure only one side is heard [Special Report: Big Tech Stole 2020 Election by Weaponizing Platforms, by Corinne Weaver, Newsbusters, December 17, 2020]. So why bother with the voting, especially when there’s reason to think that was fake too?

Regardless of whether the election was literally stolen with voter fraud and phony ballots, it was by no means a fair debate in the marketplace of ideas, as (small d) democratic apologists claim. The Biden-Harris Regime was imposed on the American people, and there’s little reason to think it’s any more legitimate than that of Alexander Lukashenko, Vladimir Putin, or Xi Jinping. The demographic policies pushed by the Regime on the Potomac aren’t any different than those China pushes in Tibet or India in Kashmir. Our government operates using the same tools as any supposed autocratic regime—the main difference is that our System pushes more destructive values than does Russia’s or China’s [America’s Social Credit System Is Worse than China’s, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, November 13, 2020].

Curtis Yarvin (aka Mencius Moldbug) is correct when he states that conservatives shouldn’t whine about this—this is simply the reality of the system. The “gigantic Paris-shelling railroad-gun bullhorn of pure proof by assertion” is the “fundamental backbone of 21st century democracy” because many people will believe what they’re told, even if there is no evidence [Vae Victis, Gray Mirror, December 16, 2020].

Today, power doesn’t come out of the barrel of a gun, but from a platform which can shape the mind. If you control those, elections, laws, and constitutions are practically irrelevant.

Of course, accepting this is going to be hard for American conservatives (or naïve patriots) who want to believe America isn’t just “free” but the “freest” country in the world. Indeed, many older Americans may still feel we must defend (or impose) this “freedom” for others. Witness Senator Marsha Blackburn showing her courage.

Yet jingoism against China is just a safety valve. It’s reminiscent, ironically, of a joke Ronald Reagan used to make about the Soviet Union.

Bashing China has few consequences.

(Except when it’s ” racist”—the police in Atlanta were called over people posting plastic signs with this picture. )

However, you can’t tweet about American election results, medical concerns, or political beliefs without being banned. It won’t just mean moving to Parler or Gab, because payment processors and even bank accounts might come next.

We’ve learned to work around all that, which leaves one option left—state repression. And with the FBI and DHS investigating “QAnon” of all things, there’s reason to believe hard tyranny will be on the way soon [Democrats seek intel on QAnon from DHS, FBI as backers join Congress, by Allison Pecorin, ABC News, December 8, 2020].

American conservatives should be working to defend liberties here at home before trying to rally us into another unnecessary war against a Chinese “enemy” that seems to hate Americans less than the typical daily newspaper.

What can be done in the face of this? Geographic concentration and even planned migration might be necessary to ensure physical safety. I also think that instead of cheering fiscal conservatism, white Americans currently left out of the ethnic spoils system should urge universal programs such as direct stimulus payments and universal basic income (UBI). Given that we are already paying for socialism, we might as well enjoy the benefits. If that makes the system untenable, so much the better.

Normal Americans are also going to have to get used to cryptocurrency and various alt-platforms simply to access content the Fourth Estate and its pet politicians don’t want us to see.

Of course, this does lead to a real danger of ghettoization and an echo chamber that actually can fuel extremism and violent fantasies. One wonders if this is the intent. When the next “Far Right” incident occurs—or is simply invented—it will provide the justification for the next crackdown, which will simply push the process further along until it ends in outright tyranny or national fragmentation.

VDARE.com talks about the “National Question,” whether the nation-state, the political expression of a particular people, has a role in this century. Americans are a nation, but it is no longer true to say Americans have a nation-state. “American nationalism” is an aspirational movement, not a defense of the existing order.

This isn’t unusual in history. Most people have never had any control over who governs. They’ve responded the way we should. Obey the law. Respect its authority. Don’t be stupid or violent. Be moral.

Yet understand that we are a stateless people with some degree of autonomy, like the Kurds. We can use that autonomy to build something new in the ruins in the old. But no progress is possible without recognizing our current subjugation.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc. His latest book is Conservatism Inc.: The Battle for the American Right.

Friday, December 18, 2020

Japan: Snowfall - 1000 stuck on Highway (CNN) 17 Dec 2020

 


Tokyo (CNN)More than 1,000 people in Japan spent Thursday night stuck on a highway in their cars, waiting out a traffic jam with little food or water during a heavy snowstorm.

Reports of the traffic jam, on the Kanetsu Expressway connecting Tokyo and Niigata prefectures, began emerging on Wednesday. By the early hours of Thursday morning, authorities had closed the highway entrance to alleviate clogging.
The jam began after a car got stuck in deep snow in the middle of the highway, grinding traffic to a halt, according to the Nippon Expressway Company (NEXCO), the country's highway operator.
The country's central and northern regions had been hit with heavy snowfall that morning, disrupting transit and causing some communities to lose power.
Traffic built up on the stalled highway; at its peak on Thursday night, the jam stretched to 15 kilometers (about 9.3 miles), NEXCO told CNN. Some segments of the long traffic line were able to move slowly with starts and stops, but some motorists remained stuck in place for more than 40 hours.
 
The jam continued through Friday; the lanes coming from Tokyo eventually cleared, but the lanes heading into the capital were still halted. As of noon on Friday, there were still 1,000 cars stuck.
 
And around their vehicles, stranded amid snow-covered fields.
Some limited relief came on Thursday when emergency responders passed out rice balls, bread, crackers, sweet snacks, and 600 bottles of water, as well as thousands of liters of gasoline and diesel oil.
But it wasn't enough, with drivers stuck for many more hours in the cold.
"The snow was extremely heavy. As time went by, the cars got buried. I was really scared," one unnamed driver told Japanese public broadcaster NHK. "I've eaten all of my food and drinks. Now, to drink water, I have to melt snow I collect in a plastic bottle."
 
A woman in her 30s and a man in his 60s were taken from the jam to hospital for respiratory problems and nausea on Thursday, according to Niigata's crisis management officer, Tsuyoshi Watanabe. No fatal or serious incidents have been reported so far.
Watanabe added that the prefecture has asked for the Japan Self-Defense Forces to be dispatched to provide water, food, gasoline and portable toilets for the people still stuck on Friday, and to help clear away the snow.
NEXCO is also warning drivers, through social media and over the radio, to be careful of the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning while waiting in their cars for hours at a time.
Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga has met with ministers to discuss the heavy snowfall, calling on local officials to work together to restore services and help those affected, NHK reported.
This story was updated to reflect that the traffic jam started on Wednesday.
 

 
 
 https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/18/asia/japan-traffic-jam-intl-hnk-scli/index.html
 
 

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

University of Mississippi Fires History Professor / Activist - 15 Dec 2020

 


The University of Mississippi informed outspoken history professor Dr. Garrett Felber on Dec. 10, 2020, that it plans to terminate him. Photo by Christian Johnson/ Ole Miss Digital Imaging Services

UM Fires History Professor Who Criticizes ‘Powerful, Racist Donors’ and ‘Carceral State’

During a period of what University of Mississippi faculty are calling a time of increasing paranoia, the university is set to terminate a celebrated professor of history. Today, sources provided the Mississippi Free Press with a copy of a termination letter sent to Dr. Garrett Felber, a tenure-track associate professor in the Arch Dalrymple III Department of History. Dr. Felber has undertaken an intimate study of the American carceral state and dedicates much of his time to educating and empowering those who are imprisoned in the United States.

History department chair Dr. Noell Wilson publicly praised Felber, author of “Those Who Know Don’t Say:The Nation of Islam, the Black Freedom Movement and the Carceral State,” in August after he was awarded a one-year fellowship at the W.E.B. Du Bois Research Institute at Harvard University’s Hutchins Center for African and African American Research, for which he is on leave from UM for the 2020-2021 academic year. Felber is also the co-author of “The Portable Malcolm X Reader” with the late Manning Marable who won a Pulitzer Prize for his biography of Malcolm X. 

University of Mississippi history professor Garrett Felber is a Malcolm X, anti-racism and decarceral scholar, publishing this book earlier this year.

“Garrett is an indefatigable researcher and community builder whose knowledge of the carceral state stems not merely from archival digging, but also from his volunteer engagement with prisons as a teacher,” Wilson told a representative from University of Mississippi News four months ago. “… We are thrilled with this award because it both recognizes his national profile in the field of African American history and provides critical space for him to advance two pioneering interpretive projects.”

But in a Dec. 10 letter, Wilson told Felber that his last day as a tenure-track professor at the University of Mississippi will be Dec. 31, 2021. 

“I am writing to inform you that I have recommended to the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts that you receive a one-year notice of nonrenewal pursuant to the University of Mississippi’s Termination of Untenured Faculty policy,” Wilson wrote to Felber. “Your employment with the University will end on December 31, 2021, and your employment contract will not be renewed after that date. At the pertinent time, I will notify you of your assigned responsibilities for the fall 2021 academic semester.” 

Wilson referred frequently to what she claims is Felber’s refusal to speak with her, concluding her letter: “Respectfully, your effort to dictate or restrict the means by which I communicate with you is untenable.Your repeated refusal to talk with me makes it impossible for me to maintain a productive working relationship with you or supervise your faculty responsibilities.”

The history professor says, however, that he did not refuse to communicate with Dr. Wilson, choosing to do it in writing. Emails between the department chair and professor, who is currently living in Oregon during the pandemic, show that Felber and Wilson communicated multiple times throughout November and December. Wilson also communicated with Felber through an administrative assistant.

‘A Chilling Effect’

On Oct. 28, 2020, Felber announced on his Twitter feed that Wilson had rejected a $42,000 grant the department was awarded for a program called “Study and Struggle,” which the professor is involved with and describes as a political education project on mass incarceration and immigrant detention. 

Felber tweeted that Wilson communicated to him that the project was political rather than historical and could potentially harm the history department’s ability to procure funding. According to that thread, this rejection came two days after the university publicized a $57,000 grant from FWD.us, an organization funded by technology companies that focuses on immigration and prison-systems reform.

In October, Felber made clear his position that the university’s relationship with powerful, racist donors was once again at play on the Oxford campus, tweeting, “The real issue is that (UM) prioritizes racist donors over all else. So it’s not some mythic politics v. history binary, but that this antiracist program threatens racist donor money. And racism is the brand. It’s in the name.”

Felber then described where the “Study and Struggle” grant money goes.

University of Mississippi history chair Dr. Noell Wilson informed Dr. Garrett Felber on Dec. 10, 2020, that he was being terminated, saying it was due to poor communication. Photo University of Mississippi

“This grant supports things like books for incarcerated participants, commissary for study groups to buy food and stamps to write pen pals, honoraria for our award-winning speakers, web design, and Spanish-translation, ASL teams, and close captioning for greater accessibility,” he tweeted.

“We’re now in the process of finding a new fiscal sponsor and removing all existing money from the University of Mississippi related to @study__struggle. We’re also looking to expand and deepen our work, so please reach out if you want to support radical study groups in prisons.”

The history professor told this reporter in October about the consequences of a university catering to the desires and complaints of racist donors.

What it does, it has a chilling effect on the ability of faculty and other people within the university to do anti-racist work. Because the university seems to be responding to the will of donors who by my definition are racist,” Felber said.

The professor has had to reconcile an undertaking of anti-racist work at a university that has never properly faced and attoned for its racist past, he explained.

“It’s been a challenge for me. I just continue to do the work,” he said in the interview. “With this particular project, the work is going to happen regardless of whether the University of Mississippi wants to be affiliated with it. Unfortunately, what it does, it makes that work much more difficult, and the weight is on faculty and largely those of us who, like in my own case, are untenured and have the most other responsibilities and the least protections. I just keep doing the work that I know is important, and I don’t let the university define for me what constitutes important research, or activism, or teaching, or any combination of those things.”

Felber is known for being vocal about prominent university faculty members and organizations. In December 2019, he kicked off the “Making and Unmaking Mass Incarceration” conference at The Lyric near the Oxford Square by revealing that it was originally supposed to be at the Overby Center for Southern Journalism and Politics.

But organizers moved the conference, Felber said, due to the center’s namesake, who teaches journalism at the university, being on the board of directors of CoreCivic, the nation’s second-largest for-profit private-prison company, since 2001. Felber projected images of Overby and information about CoreCivic onto the large overhead screen.

‘Increasing Levels of Paranoia on Campus’

When contacted by the Mississippi Free Press in October, Dr. Noell Wilson referred inquiries about Felber’s tweets and the declined grant to university communications. Chief Marketing and Communications Officer Jim Zook did not make himself available for an interview, but provided the following statement.

“The university’s decision to decline Dr. Garrett Felber’s request to accept a grant for his Mississippi Freedom Winter Project was made after several considerations and in consultation with the relevant campus offices. Dr. Felber did not follow the appropriate process for seeking external funding, a process for which he has been briefed individually by representatives of several administrative offices across campus. Dr. Felber submitted his proposal to a private charitable foundation without the knowledge of his department chair or other officials,” Zook wrote in the prepared statement.

“If he had followed UM’s process of engaging with external funders, his department chair would have had the opportunity to advise him on how best to align his proposal with the Department of History’s research, teaching and service mission as articulated in its mission statement. As a public research institution, the university is committed to supporting the work of all faculty, being good stewards of both public and private grants and ensuring that all work on behalf of UM aligns with the mission of our collective schools and units.”

When asked through an email followup if donor dissatisfaction or a perceived threat to departmental fundraising influenced the decision to reject the grant money, university communications provided no response.

Felber’s termination comes during a tense time for faculty on the University of Mississippi campus or as a different UM professor told this publication today: “Feel free to note the increasing levels of paranoia on campus.” The Mississippi Free Press reported on Dec. 8, 2020, that the university was investigating the campus ombudsman after this publication’s series on racist, sexist and homophobic emails between the now-former journalism dean and donors resulted in a university effort to out whistleblowers who provided the emails to that publication. As a result, faculty members are saying that they are concerned that the university will access the ombuds’ confidential emails from staff and students, perhaps leading to reprisal. 

Glenn Boyce
University of Mississippi Chancellor Glenn Boyce’s controversial appointment preceded a period of faculty paranoia that many professors say is worsening. The UM Faculty Senate recently voted to ask Boyce to support sociology professor James Thomas and academic freedom. Photo: University of Mississippi

This afternoon, Chancellor Glenn Boyce sent an email to faculty members indicating that he is looking for an interim ombudsman, but providing no details on the status of the current ombudsman.

This reporter also reported on Dec. 9 that the UM faculty senate had voted to call on Chancellor Glenn Boyce, who took the position in a cloud of campus controversy, to support sociology professor James Thomas as the Mississippi state auditor targets him for participating in #ScholarStrike, an anti-racism educational effort among college academics across the United States.

“I’m just so deeply dismayed by the willingness of faculty and administrators at all levels of the university who acquiesce to the will of these powerful racist, donors,” Felber told this reporter in October. 

“Individually, these people will continue to tell me they respect the work, and appreciate it, and support it, and will until the push from above comes, and then they willfully misrepresent and do things like what my chair did,” Felber said then.

“It’s all very calculated and it feels—it’s not just structurally racist, it’s also personally betraying to say that you support these things, then when it actually matters they always acquiesce. It just has a profound effect on all of us doing the work to actually continue to do the stuff that matters and not get mired in calling the university out for its lies continually. The people that that harms the most are the people who benefit from these projects. People who are already excluded from the university through structural racism.” 

Christian Middleton

Christian Middleton

Contributing reporter Christian Middleton is a graduate of Missouri State University and now lives and writes in Oxford, Miss. Email him at christianmiddleton13@gmail.com. 
 

FOCUS: Higher Ed • COVID-19 • Voting EducationRace & Racism • Immigration • Food Security  LGBTQ • UM Emails • Policing