Bulldogs are notorious for their tenacity or “cool persistency of purpose”, as Honest Abe said of General Grant, “He has the grip of a bulldog; when he once gets his teeth in, nothing can shake him off.”
The EU master class could give the doggies a lockjaw master-class. Many
European states have tried to free themselves from the Prison of the
European Nations; all failed.
Will
BoJo, as they call the redhead Boris Johnson, the British Prime
Minister, succeed where many politicians and nations failed? He is also a
bulldog by his own right; he believes in his cause; he enjoys support
of the people and hatred of professional politicians. If anybody can, he
has a chance. And if he wins, the domination of the hostile elites will
receive a terrible blow.
Though
on Wednesday 9/4 he suffered a defeat, it is not the end of the story.
The fat lady didn’t sing yet. There are still many ways for a tenacious
man to get England out of the EU by the end of October. Promised support
of the Brexit Party in the elections presents one possibility. Going
hard Brexit, that is no-deal Brexit without Parliament approval is also
technically possible.
The
fight for Brexit is not a fight with or against Europe. Europeans are
with BoJo against their own elites. The French dream of Frexit, and even
Greeks would prefer Grexit to their present position of a country
reduced by austerity to shambles. Whenever people were asked whether
they want to remain in the EU, this undemocratic organisation wholly
owned and managed by hostile elites, they usually answered by roaring
No. The list is long. In 2005, the French voted Non to the EU Constitution, Nee
said the Dutch; other governments got the message and shrewdly
cancelled the referendums. Norway, Switzerland, Ireland, Greenland,
Denmark, Greece voted No, but the hostile elites did not take no
for an answer. Always they arranged this or that subterfuge, provided a
different question for a new poll, or most often ruled that no
referendum was necessary. In the case of Greece, the people voted No,
but the ruling party said ‘never mind’ and answered Yes.
The
most important Western European donor nations want to get out. This is
not surprising. The EU is operated by its unelected commission, while
the EU parliament has practically no powers. The EU promotes massive
immigration diluting and replacing the native population; it obsesses
with sexual perversions presented as a new norm; it is violently
anti-Christian; it loves expensive green energy and petrol taxes. It
works in full harmony with the European mass media, which is as awful as
the American one. The EU prescribes austerity for lower and middle
classes; taxes labour; is generous with the banks and the bankers. Only
new European states, perspective recipients of EU aid, vote Yes; the
most enthusiastic are Lithuania, Slovakia and North Macedonia, and it is
hardly the most desirable company for a nice country like Britain.
The
EU had been described as the American colonial device to rule occupied
Europe, but election of Trump revealed a nuance. There are now two
Americas, the America of Trump and his nationalist supporters, and the
Internationalist liberal America; this second America is in full
symbiosis with the EU. That’s why BoJo, a pro-American friend of Trump,
wants to complete Brexit.
His
chief adversary Jeremy Corbyn also dreams of Brexit to take England out
of neo-liberal EU to its socialist future, but he plays a cautious game
for he wants to defeat Boris Johnson and get to No. 10 Downing Street
himself. He flirts with the Remainers for he needs every vote for
victory, and he is worried that in case of successful Brexit, Johnson
would be undefeatable. Otherwise, he is as keen on Brexit as Johnson,
though for different reasons.
Other
people have various reasons and aims; no doubt the cause of Brexit is
very popular with people despite the three-years-long torture. It had
been proven by the recent elections to EU Parliament; a clear majority
voted for the candidates supporting Brexit. If democracy means the
choice of people, Brexit is the most democratic act England can
entertain, even if for this purpose the Westminster Parliament has to be
shut down.
The
British referendum of 2016 created an unexpected Overton Window, and
people rushed for it. The elites miscalculated when they deemed the
British were fully tamed. These smart people knew it is a good chance
and a great occasion and voted No. Who wouldn’t! The elites were
shocked, like the US hostile elites were shocked by Trump victory. And
they immediately began to work to overturn the result – just like their
American counterparts. They are persistent of purpose, if anything. The
referendum in Britain took place in June 2016, and since then the elites
do everything to prevent the people’s will to be fulfilled.
The Guardian is a leading anti-Brexit newspaper. Once I was a devout Guardian
reader; it was a cheerful left-wing newspaper with John Pilger, Seamus
Milne and other good guys and gals, an obvious choice for Julian Assange
and his Wikileaks. Since then, it turned 180 degrees and became the
most nauseating rag in whole English-speaking world. I have lost
interest in its daily portion of people with exotic names describing the
micro-aggressions they suffered; feminists against body-shaming,
transgenders in search of a public toilet; Jews fearing nasty Corbyn;
75-year old ladies in search for their first orgasm (no exaggeration)
and other stuff that is of no relevance for me at all.
For last three years, The Guardian
hasn’t missed a chance to scaremonger Brexiteers. There will be no
food, the country will collapse, law and order will be gone, they
prophesied. For me, it is a good argument for Brexit: whatever The Guardian calls for, can’t be good for you.
Another nasty piece of media, The Economist,
also preaches for Remain. Once a great magazine, it is now a bankers’
voice. The Trots’ SJW media joined them in an unusual combination. It is
not often the Economist and The Socialist Worker are united in a single voice.
The
British people who wanted and voted for Brexit were described as racists
and chauvinists. I am not keen on racism, a misleading and divisive
ideology; but anti-racists are even worse. Anti-racism is the ideology
of conquest and replacement. The conquistadors were anti-racists, while
the Native Americans could be presented as racists, for they fought
against the invaders.
If
Britain were a normal country like it was 50 years ago, it would go
through Brexit like a hot knife through butter. But its working class
had been ruined by Thatcher; London became the abode of choice for
wealthy Arabs and Russians, served by Poles and Indians. The new
cosmopolitan population has no interest in England and the English
people, and they also have the right to vote. They prefer the EU, a
supranational body that is good for finances and good for immigrants.
The
majority of parliamentarians are against Brexit. They hate Brexit almost
as much as they hate Corbyn. “Too many MPs try desperately to derail
Brexit, – said John Baron MP. – Too many members of the Commons are
secretly Remain MPs and have kicked the can down the road too often, and
should own up to the fact that what they really want to do is stop
Brexit.”
We
may disregard their explanations, whether they say they want “an orderly
Brexit”, or they want to stop “Johnson’s coup”. What they want is to
remain in the EU, in the structure they are connected with. The
professional politicians live by their connections, and their
connections are with the EU and with American Internationalist
establishment.
Meanwhile
the Brits can comfort themselves that the agreement of Mrs May had been
derailed. This agreement was probably worse than Remain, as it would
leave England in every arrangement of the EU except participation in
decision-making. Britain would also have to pay over $40 billion, or
perhaps more. The EU does not want Britain to leave, for it is a major
donor; Brexit is likely to open doors for other states to follow. EU
will have less money to spend for feeding its poor new East European
members, let alone the dirt-poor Ukraine. All influence EU has in
Britain had been mobilised to derail Brexit. Now, with the new Benn Law
the EU will be able to make Johnson’s job real difficult.
The
best Brexit is hard no-deal Brexit. After getting out, independent
Britain would be able to peacefully negotiate new relationship with the
EU. By blocking the No-Deal solution, the parliamentarians had made the
task of leaving almost impossible and very costly.
The
EU does not want to ride into sunset and vanish. It is fighting against
Brexit by setting a new standard. If the Roman Empire were run by EU
functionaries, Britain would still be its part. If the Russians knew
they could charge the Baltic states and East Germany for their leaving
the USSR and the Warsaw Pact umpteen billions, NATO would have never
have moved East. Boris Johnson has been chided by Donald Tusk, the
President of the European Council, for his country Poland is a major
recipient of EU aid, while the UK have paid for Polish well-being. He
does not want to see Britain leave like any slave-owner hates to see his
slave escaping to freedom.
The
Brexit debacle is a sign of crisis of democracy. The British people’s
will has repeatedly been thwarted by the elected parliamentarians and
non-elected administrators. It is practically the same in the US, where
the people’s will has been clearly expressed by election of Trump. His
supporters wanted to return American soldiers home, to make friends with
Russia, to stop mass migration, to end demonization of white American
men. All these wishes were foiled by elected congressmen and by
non-elected servants of the Deep State.
The
people’s will should prevail, in England, in the US and in Europe. For
that, the immense power of hostile international elites should be
contained; the mass media restored to the people and parliaments purged
of people who care more for Israel than for their own states. Indeed,
the Labour would be able to tackle Brexit better if it weren’t
frustrated by antisemitism witch-hunt. There is a clear correlation
between the Jewish cause and the cause of Remain, but that can be
discussed another time.
No comments:
Post a Comment