|
Workers Vanguard No. 1139
|
7 September 2018
|
In Honor of John Brown
Part One
We print below the first part of a presentation,
edited for publication, given by Spartacist League Central Committee
member Don Alexander at a February 24 Black History Month forum in New
York City.
I was just handed a piece of paper with a quote by James
P. Cannon, founder of American Trotskyism, that I want to start with.
It’s from his speech on the way to prison in 1943, when 18 Trotskyist
and Minneapolis Teamsters union leaders were jailed for opposing
imperialist World War II. Cannon said, “The grandest figure in the whole
history of America was John Brown” (printed in Speeches for Socialism [1971]).
Over the years, a number of comrades have paid tribute to John Brown in
North Elba, New York, where he is buried, and have given talks on
different aspects of the Civil War and Reconstruction. We raise the
slogans “Finish the Civil War!” and “For black liberation through
socialist revolution!” to express the historic tasks that fall to the
revolutionary party. Acting as the tribune of the people, a
revolutionary workers party will fight for the interests of all the
oppressed—black people, Latinos, women, Asians, immigrants and others.
It will lead the working class to carry out a third American revolution,
a proletarian revolution, the only road to the full integration of
black people into an egalitarian socialist society.
The existence of black chattel slavery in the United
States had a peculiar character. “Chattel” means personal property; it
meant to own people like cattle to trade or kill. Comrades and friends
will recall that veteran Trotskyist Richard S. Fraser underscored in his
writings some 60 years ago how the concept of race was central to the
development of American capitalism. He outlined how the material basis
of black oppression drew upon a precapitalist system of production.
Slavery played an important role in the development of British
industrial capitalism and U.S. capitalism. British textile owners
received Southern cotton, which was shipped by powerful New York
merchants. New York merchants used some of this money to send
manufactured goods to the South. Although slavery and capitalism were
intertwined, they were different economic systems. There is an excellent
presentation by comrade Jacob Zorn called “Slavery and the Origins of
American Capitalism” (printed in WV Nos. 942, 943 and 944, 11 and 25 September and 9 October 2009).
I will add that the conflation of slaves with skin color
didn’t exist in ancient slavery. But with regard to the U.S., the great
black abolitionist Frederick Douglass put it well: “We are then a
persecuted people not because we are colored, but simply
because this color has for a series of years been coupled in the public
mind with the degradation of slavery and servitude.” Black people
constitute a race-color caste, with their color defining their so-called
inferior status. In the majority, black people are forcibly segregated
at the bottom of this racist, capitalist system, deemed pariahs and
outcasts. Anti-black racism is ruthlessly promoted by the ruling class
to keep the working class divided and to conceal the common class
interests of working people against their exploiters.
Today, the filthy rich capitalists’ huge profits rest
upon the backs of working people—black, immigrant and white. The rulers’
system of “checks and balances” has been and always will be that they
get the checks while they balance their bone-crushing, anti-worker,
anti-poor budgets on our backs! The multiracial working class, with a
strategic black component, has the social power and the interest to
champion the fight not only for black freedom, but of all the oppressed
and to break the chains of wage slavery. Whether or not this is
understood at the moment, the fight for black freedom is an inseparable
part of the struggle for the emancipation of the entire working class
from capitalist exploitation. The working class cannot take power
without confronting and defeating centuries of black oppression. We say
that those who labor must rule!
The Road to Harpers Ferry
In reflecting on John Brown, fellow abolitionist Harriet
Tubman once said: We didn’t call him John Brown, we called him our
“savior” because he died for our people. In the late 1950s and early
’60s, military veteran Robert F. Williams, who organized armed
self-defense against the Klan and was driven out of the country on
trumped-up kidnapping charges, carried around with him a copy of A Plea for Captain John Brown, an 1859 speech in defense of Brown by Henry David Thoreau. Malcolm X also praised John Brown.
The notion that John Brown was crazy, an insane mass
murderer and a fanatic, is still peddled in bourgeois academia and
cinema. The truth is that John Brown was a revolutionary who saw deeper
than any other abolitionist that it would take a revolution, a bloody
war to uproot slavery. John Brown did not dread that war. He did not
deprecate it. He did not seek to avert it. And that is one reason why
the bourgeoisie still looks at him with disdain and hatred.
Along with Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman, John
Brown was part of the revolutionary wing of the abolitionist movement
who saw the outlines of what was coming in the struggle to destroy
chattel slavery. Abraham Lincoln was a good leader during the Civil War
who, under pressure, did eventually make it an official war against
slavery. John Brown’s final push against slavery had been to lead a raid
on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia. For this, he and
several of his followers were publicly executed by the State of Virginia
in December 1859.
Summing up for the world his last thoughts before his
hanging, John Brown hurled a bolt of lightning toward his captors and
executioners, proclaiming that this land must be purged with blood—there
needed to be revolution. He was almost 60 years old, which is quite
amazing. How did John Brown become a revolutionary abolitionist
dedicated to the destruction of slavery through force?
From where did he think he would get the forces to accomplish his goals?
What is the significance today of his struggle for black freedom?
John Brown was born in 1800. He was a generation removed
from the first American Revolution which, while getting rid of British
colonial oppression, left slavery intact and in most states gave
suffrage only to propertied white males. He was deeply religious and
raised by parents who hated slavery. His father Owen Brown, who had a
significant influence on John, was a pacifist and a Calvinist as well as
an active abolitionist, a stationmaster and conductor on the
Underground Railroad. Fueled by Protestant beliefs, his family was tough
and resourceful.
Owen subscribed to abolitionist papers like The Liberator, which
John grew up reading. John Brown worked with his father on the
Underground Railroad, gaining valuable experience for his future
revolutionary activities. While herding cattle when he was 12 years old,
John witnessed a young slave boy being pummeled mercilessly by a
slaveholder with an iron shovel. This incident shook him to the core.
John picked up on the fact that in contrast to the slave boy, he himself
was treated very well by the slaveowner. This only infuriated John
more. He knew that the slave boy was horribly oppressed and had nothing,
not a mother and not a father. From that point on, John Brown declared
eternal war on slavery.
Brown fervently believed in the “divine authenticity of
the Bible.” His prayers were combined with a call to deliver the slaves
from bondage. But he was not sitting back and waiting for his pie in the
sky. As black historian Benjamin Quarles put it in Allies for Freedom: Blacks and John Brown
(1974): “Prayer to Brown was a prelude to action, not a release from
further involvement.” In his last days, he cursed hypocritical preachers
and their offers of consolation, saying they should be praying for
themselves.
John Brown and Abolitionism
I would like to briefly touch on the abolitionist
movement. The U.S. abolitionist movement was part of the broader
bourgeois radicalism in the 19th century, developing from radical
elements of the Protestant Reformation and the 18th-century
Enlightenment. It was also a product of the limitations of the first
American Revolution, which continued the enslavement of half a million
people. By John Brown’s time, the number of slaves had grown to four
million.
In the beginning of his political awakening, John Brown admired the anti-slavery Quakers and also closely read The Liberator,
which was put out by the most famous abolitionist, William Lloyd
Garrison of Boston. Some of the first abolitionists like Garrison had
belonged to the American Colonization Society that formed in 1816. The
Colonization Society was a racist alliance between abolitionists and
slaveholders promoting the settlement of black Americans in Africa. The
underlying purpose of the colonization scheme was to drive free blacks
out of the country. Free blacks were viewed with suspicion that they
might stir up slave rebellions. Black abolitionists, who saw the
organization as anathema, bitterly and vigorously resisted colonization
because it told black people that they should leave the land of their
birth.
Starting in 1817, a series of black abolitionist
conventions was organized in various cities in order to defeat this
racist program, in what came to be known as the Negro Convention
Movement. After attending the 1831 National Negro Convention, William
Lloyd Garrison became radicalized and eventually sharply repudiated
colonization. This gained him respect, admiration and support among
abolitionists—especially black abolitionists.
There was considerable racism in the abolitionist
movement. However, radical abolitionists had a wider vision for human
emancipation. As we stated in Black History and the Class Struggle
No. 5 (February 1988): “Although slavery was their preeminent concern,
these radical bourgeois egalitarians also fought for many other pressing
political issues of the time, such as free education, religious
tolerance and workers’ rights.” The women’s suffrage movement first
began as a fight within abolitionism over the role of women anti-slavery
activists. Women’s rights leaders such as Angelina Grimké and her
sister Sarah, who came from a slaveholding family, were staunch fighters
for black freedom. They were clear on the connection between black and
women’s oppression. Angelina said: “I want to be identified with the
negro; until he gets his rights, we shall never have ours.” The radical
egalitarianism embodied in this principled position also animated John
Brown’s hatred of all oppression.
The beginning of the formation of white abolitionist
organizations was the establishment of the New England Anti-Slavery
Society. Formed in 1832, it was galvanized by Nat Turner’s slave revolt a
year prior, which killed some 60 white people. The revolt was followed
by the execution of Nat Turner and his followers, and the massacre of a
considerable number of black people.
William Lloyd Garrison represented the “moral suasion”
wing of the abolitionists. Garrison also thought that the North should
secede from the South, which objectively meant leaving the slaves
helpless and defenseless. Although he sincerely hated slavery and wanted
to see it destroyed, he stood for passive resistance. He rejected
political action and instead put forward a futile program to appeal to
the conscience of slaveowners to liberate their slaves. Garrison’s
slogan of “No Union with Slaveholders” placed the struggle against
slavery on the level of particular evils of individual slaveholders.
Frederick Douglass, who started out as a Garrisonian,
strenuously objected to this slogan, recognizing that behind it was a
defeatist strategy. He counterposed an aggressive fight against slavery.
He instead raised in its place the slogan, “No Union with
Slaveholding.” This was not a word play, but a different program and
outlook. Douglass understood that the slaveholding system had to be
destroyed, mainly through political means.
John Brown followed the debates and struggles of the
abolitionists closely, especially those of the militant black
abolitionists such as the young minister Henry Highland Garnet and David
Walker, who advocated that the slaves rise up against their hated
oppressors. According to social historian Robert Allen in his book Reluctant Reformers
(1975), David Walker “was a free black who operated a small business in
Boston, and in his spare time acted as a local agent for Freedom’s Journal, a
black anti-slavery newspaper.” Walker argued that a “God of justice and
armies” would destroy the whole system. His pamphlet, the Appeal, called for the immediate abolition of slavery.
But Walker was contradictory. He combined a militant
stance of resistance to slaveholders with a call for the masters to
repent and to voluntarily relinquish the slave system. He had explicit
instructions on what the slaves must do when they rose up for their
freedom: “Make sure work—do not trifle, for they will not trifle with
you—they want us for their slaves, and think nothing of murdering us in
order to subject us to that wretched condition—therefore, if there is an
attempt made by us, kill or be killed.” The Southern planters wanted
him captured dead or alive and enacted state bans on anti-slavery
literature. Reportedly, both Walker’s Appeal and Henry Highland
Garnet’s address to the 1843 National Negro Convention appeared together
in a pamphlet that John Brown paid to produce. Brown would incorporate
the spirit of Walker’s Appeal in his attempt to win black people to his revolutionary plans.
Transforming into a Revolutionary
As I mentioned earlier, as a young man, John Brown was an
Underground Railroad operator. The Underground Railroad was bringing to
the fore the most conscious elements of anti-slavery black radicalism.
The great significance of the Underground Railroad, an interracial
network of activists who were willing to risk their lives, was not the
number of slaves it freed—which was perhaps 1,000 slaves per year out of
a population of four million slaves. Its importance in the long run was
that it crystallized a black abolitionist vanguard in the North. As the
historian W.E.B. DuBois wrote, it “more and more secured the
cooperation of men like John Brown, and of others less radical but just
as sympathetic.”
In pursuing his growing commitment to black freedom, at
age 34, John Brown wrote a letter to his brother about his aspiration to
establish a school for black people. He understood the revolutionary
implications of this: “If the young blacks of our country could once
become enlightened, it would most assuredly operate on slavery like
firing powder confined in rock, and all the slaveholders know it well.”
In the 1830s and ’40s, John Brown moved around a lot to
earn a living and support his family. He went to Springfield,
Massachusetts, and became more familiar with the lives and struggles of
black people. Brown moved to North Elba in upstate New York, where
well-known and wealthy radical abolitionist Gerrit Smith had donated
land to be used by black people for farming. Brown forged ties with
Smith as well as with radical black New York abolitionists like James
McCune Smith and the Gloucester family of Brooklyn. He had many
unsuccessful business pursuits, as a tanner, a land surveyor, a wool
merchant. His travels while doing business enabled him to gain
indispensable knowledge of the different strands of abolitionism in the
Midwest and Northeast. From what he observed, he wasn’t impressed with
the talkathons of abolitionist meetings. He never joined them because he
disdained mere talk.
Brown was never able to set up a school, but he pressed
on with teaching black people history and how to farm and carry out
self-defense against slave catchers. His belief in social equality was
clear. He shocked one white visitor to his home, who observed that black
people were eating at the same table with the Brown family. The Browns
showed respect to the black people there by addressing them as Mister
and Missus.
John Brown kept his ear close to the ground, the better
to follow and assimilate the thoughts of free and fugitive black people.
Under the guise of a black writer, he wrote to a black abolitionist
paper, the Ram’s Horn, to offer his frank opinions on how best to
push forward black self-improvement. He didn’t hide his observations or
criticisms of what he considered to be negative behaviors of some black
people, ranging from flashy dressing to smoking—surely in accordance
with his strict Calvinist morality. At the same time, he struggled to
win them to the understanding that they should not meekly bow down to
white racist aggression, but should resist it.
There was one major development that accelerated his
transformation into a professional revolutionary. It was the 1837
violent killing of Elijah Lovejoy, the editor of an anti-slavery
newspaper in Alton, Illinois. Lovejoy was attacked by a pro-slavery mob,
which also hurled his printing press into the river. His murder shocked
the abolitionist movement. Lovejoy was the first abolitionist
martyr—and it could happen to any of them.
John Brown’s developing revolutionary social
consciousness cost him some racist “anti-slavery” friends. As the
biographer Tony Horwitz noted: “The Browns believed in full equality for
blacks and were determined to fight for it” (Midnight Rising: John Brown and the Raid that Sparked the Civil War
[2011]). The family’s resistance to segregation came to a head when
they fought for integration in a Congregational church they attended.
During a revival meeting, black people in attendance were seated in the
rear of the church. At the next church service, Brown and his family
gave up their seats and led the black worshippers to sit in theirs,
located in the family pew. The deacons of the church were outraged and
later wrote to them that they should find somewhere else to worship.
This vile racism led John to distance himself from the institution of
the church.
Preparing for Battle
Consciously wanting to link up with militant black
abolitionists, John Brown put Frederick Douglass high on his list.
Douglass and Brown had their first meeting in 1847 in Springfield,
Massachusetts. Brown had avidly read Douglass’s abolitionist paper, The North Star (later Frederick Douglass’ Paper), and went on to share his developing plans. According to Horwitz:
“Brown pointed to a map of the Allegheny Mountains,
which run diagonally from Pennsylvania into Maryland and Virginia and
deep into the South. Filled with natural forts and caves, these
mountains, Brown said, had been placed by God ‘for the emancipation of
the negro race’.”
This meeting was a turning point in Douglass’s evolution
from a protégé of Garrison into a revolutionary abolitionist. Brown
fought to convince him of the futility of non-resistance to the
slaveholders. He told him that the only thing the slaveowners
appreciated was sticks upside their heads—something like that. Five
years later, Douglass would abandon his naive faith in pacifist
non-resistance. He began to openly state that slavery could be destroyed
only through bloodshed, which shocked his former comrades.
Going forward, several challenges loomed for both
revolutionary abolitionists, Douglass and Brown: the Fugitive Slave Act
of 1850, the further expansion of slavery to the Western territories
like Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857. The last involved a
slave named Dred Scott who sued for his freedom on the basis that he had
resided in a free state for many years. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney
ruled against Scott and went on to assert that black people, free or
slave, were not U.S. citizens. In the words of Taney, which are echoed
by today’s modern-day slaveholders—the ruling class in this
country—black people “had no rights which the white man was bound to
respect.”
Let me say a few things about the continued expansion of
slavery. The South’s cotton production was booming in the 1840s and
’50s. It supplied most of the world’s demand, outstripping other
American exports combined. Northerners wanted slavery to stay put where
it was.
Many white laborers were primarily concerned with having
to compete with black people for jobs, not with the inherent brutality
against and degradation of slaves. Some Northern states, such as Ohio
and Illinois, had long enacted “Black Laws” that set controls on freed
blacks and deterred black people from migrating there. Meanwhile, there
were bloody land grabs under way, such as during the 1846-48
Mexican-American War, when the United States seized about half of
Mexico’s territory. The appetites of slaveowners and prospective ones
were whetted. The question was sharply posed: Could Southerners carry
“their” property into new territories? Would those territories be free
or slave?
The Compromise of 1850, which was contentious in
Congress, concluded that California would be a free state, while the
question of Utah and New Mexico was left to the white settlers to
decide. Along with this, the new Fugitive Slave Act (the first was
enacted in 1793) now mandated that ordinary citizens were required to
aid in the capture and return of runaway slaves, even forming posses to
do so. Northerners in effect became deputized slave catchers.
Douglass had plenty to say about the 1850 Fugitive Slave
Act. In 1852 he remarked: “The only way to make the Fugitive Slave Law a
dead letter is to make half a dozen or more dead kidnappers. A half
dozen or more dead kidnappers carried down South would cool the ardor of
Southern gentlemen, and keep their rapacity in check.” Anti-slavery
fury was swelling in the North, and in places like Boston, slave
catchers were set upon and fugitives freed. However, because the full
power of the federal government lay behind the enforcement of the law,
militant abolitionists were not always successful.
For his part, John Brown responded to the Fugitive Slave
Act by forming a secret self-defense organization to fight slave
catchers. The organization was called the United States League of
Gileadites, named after Gideon, a figure in the Old Testament who
repelled the attacks of enemies who far outnumbered his forces. Brown
drew up a fighting program for the League called “Words of Advice.” In
the League’s manifesto, he offered such tactics as “when engaged do not
work by halves, but make clean work with your enemies…. Never confess,
never betray, never renounce the cause.”
With a plan slowly germinating in his mind, John Brown
was gathering the forces for the raid on Harpers Ferry. As
then-Trotskyist George Novack wrote about Brown in January 1938 (printed
in the New International), “By establishing a stronghold in the
mountains bordering Southern territory from which his men could raid the
plantations, he planned to free the slaves, and run them off to
Canada.” Accordingly, Brown did a serious investigation of the terrain,
including circling on a map figures on slave concentrations throughout
the South. This information was discovered after he was captured at
Harpers Ferry.
John Brown also prepared through reading and travel. A
number of his business pursuits enabled him to go to places outside the
U.S. like England, for example, where in 1851 he went seeking better
prices for his wool. A key part of his trip to Europe was to inspect
military fortifications, like at Waterloo where Napoleon met defeat. He
studied military tactics and especially guerrilla war in mountainous
terrain. He read books on Nat Turner’s revolt, the Maroons—the runaway
slaves in Jamaica and other places who waged guerrilla warfare—and
Francisco Espoz y Mina, the guerrilla leader in Spain during the
Napoleonic Wars. He also had books on Toussaint L’Ouverture, leader of
the Haitian Revolution of 1791-1804, and a biography of the leader of
the English Revolution of 1640, Oliver Cromwell. Brown was familiar with
and recited for his friends and followers the story of Spartacus, who
led a slave rebellion against Roman rule.
His preparations for war meant that he didn’t spend a lot
of time with the rest of his family in North Elba. They understood and
agreed, knowing that while he was away, it was their duty to resist the
slave catchers, even if it meant imprisonment or death. Brown cared
deeply for his family’s welfare and tried to alleviate some of their
brutal poverty. He did what he could to support them as they all endured
incredible hardships and suffered many setbacks. For example, John
himself fathered 20 children and lost nine of them before they reached
age ten, including three on three consecutive days. The Brown family
knew that the cause of the slaves’ emancipation transcended their
personal lives and they stuck it out, together. For John Brown, slavery
was the “sum of villanies,” the ultimate atrocity against human freedom.
And the fight lay ahead.
[TO BE CONTINUED]
http://xenagoguevicene.com/2018/09/13/in-honor-of-john-brown-workers-vanguard-7-sept-2018/
No comments:
Post a Comment